1 Jan Buy ASTM E TEST METHOD FOR ANALYSIS OF AUSTENITIC STAINLESS STEEL BY SPARK ATOMIC EMISSION. ASTM E – Download as PDF File .pdf), Text File .txt) or read online. 14 Sep Norma ASTM E E Standard Test Method for Analysis of Austenitic Stainless Steel by Spark Designation: E −
|Country:||Republic of Macedonia|
|Published (Last):||13 July 2011|
|PDF File Size:||11.52 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||3.80 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The precision data for the three unknowns are shown in Table 2. Referenced Documents purchase separately The documents listed below are referenced within the subject standard but are not provided as part of the standard. The technique of analyzing reference materials with unknowns and performing the indicated e11086 corrections ashm also be used to correct for interference effects and to compensate for errors resulting from instrument drift.
Cracks, voids, pits, moisture, or inclusions will limit the sampling and the accuracy of a determination. Work Item s – proposed revisions of this standard.
Make a good electrical ground. A verifier may be used as a calibrant even though it is burned only as a verifier. Permission rights to photocopy the standard may also be secured from the ASTM website www. One or more of the reference materials must closely approximate the composition of the specimen.
If you feel that your comments have not received a fair hearing you should make your views known to the ASTM Committee on Standards, at the address shown below. Position the specimen so there will e10086 a uniform pattern of excitations around its face. We need your help to maintenance this website. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Historical Version s – view previous versions of standard.
ASTM International – Standard References for ASTM E – 14
The technique of analyzing reference materials along with unknowns and performing the indicated mathematical corrections may also be used to correct for interference effects and to compensate for errors resulting from instrument drift. Keywords the testing of this test method. Perform the final grind with a dry abrasive belt or disc. Any of these that will achieve analytical accuracy equivalent to that reported for this test method are acceptable.
Instrument calibrations were performed utilizing 1 reference materials supplied with the unknowns, 2 in-house reference materials, and 3 NIST and British Certified reference materials. Active view current version of standard. Preparation of Apparatus Please copy and paste this embed script to where you want to embed Embed Script.
A variety of such systems are commonly used. Any of these that will achieve analytical accuracy equivalent to that reported for this test method are acceptable.
Significance and Use 5. Interference corrections will not be necessary if: The samples must be sufficiently massive to prevent overheating during the discharge and of a similar metallurgical condition and composition as the reference materials. If the spectrometer system and software permits, perform random excitations of each calibrant and drift correction sample and repeat with different random sequences at least four times.
Spectral lines are listed in Table 1. Link to Active This link will always route to the current Active version of the standard.
Procedure for Excitation and Radiation Measurement C Estimate of the standard deviation of any single random analysis within laboratories. Any of these that will achieve analytical accuracy equivalent to that reported for this test method are acceptable. Place the freshly surfaced specimen on the excitation stand in a manner to effect a gas-tight seal and adequate argon flushing.
B Estimate of the overall accuracy for a single analysis from any laboratory. Preparation of Samples 9. Using the averages of the data for each aatm, determine analytical curves in accordance with Practice E Please fill this form, we will try to respond as soon as possible.
Please help us to share our service with your friends. Grinding materials with grit sizes ranging from 60 to have been found satisfactory. The argon system shall be in accordance with Practice E The agreement between the results obtained by chemical methods and d1086 obtained by this test method is displayed in Table 3.
ASTM E1086 – 14
If the results satm not within the control limits established in Originally approved in Carlos Guillermo Somoza Alvarenga Category: B Either iron line This procedure is suitable for manufacturing control and inspection testing. Flush, s Preburn, s Integration, s 2 10 10 or 15 Argon Flow 0. These may be aztm wet or dry grinding devices. Avoid the center of cast specimens because of possible quench cracks and segregation. Examine the specimen after each excitation to evaluate the quality of excitation.
Last previous edition approved in as E — Current edition approved March 1,